…. It’s a mistake

Rebecca Glass wonders whether Joe Girardi should have gone to Mariano Rivera in the seventh inning last night:

…. Here’s the leverage argument:

Because of the importance of the situation, with the tying runs on base and the Angels’ best hitters (Hunter-Guerrerro-Morales) due up, Girardi should have gone to Mariano Rivera.

It’s a claim that much of the MSM and their readers/viewers will brush off as being too reactionary, but it’s based on the single, simple premise discussed above:

Teams should use their very best relievers in the highest leveraged situations.

At the time, there is utterly no way to predict that the ninth inning will matter or how much it will matter. What you know, however, is that at the time, the two potential tying runs on base are the two most important runs you want to prevent from scoring if you are the Yankees.

She is absolutely right. Watching the game, I was aghast when I saw Burnett come out for the seventh. In my view, the hitters had just gotten him off the hook for his horrible start to the game, the bullpen was fully rested after Sabbathia went eight innings and then they had a day off…. I mean, no matter how you slice it, there was no reason whatsoever to allow Burnett to continue in that game. Not to mention, as Don Zimmer used to say to Joe Torre –when Girardi was his catcher, by the way– “it gets late early in the postseason.” For Girardi and the Yankees, it’s late now. Girardi’s error could cost his team everything, and his error was clear the minute it was happening. If you were in the Yankees dugout, how did you not wonder what the hell was going on? What do you think Derek Jeter was thinking as he watched Burnett sweat his way through the 8th and 9th place hitters on the Angels?

The Yankees were nine outs from the World Series, with a two run lead, a shaky all season long starter who had already been raked, and every reliever in his bullpen was available. And in case you are still wondering if I am over reacting, let me make it even clearer:


That means that all Girardi had to do was get three outs without allowing a run, in an inning in which the lineup was #8 hitter, #9 hitter, and Chone Figgins, who was 2 for 31 to that point in the postseason. To get that job done, he used the aforementioned shaky AJ Burnett, who allowed two base-runners in about ten seconds, and then –with the tying runs on base and nobody out in a game in which the Yankees were nine outs from going to the Serious– Girardi went to Damaso Marte, easily the worst pitcher on the Yankees playoff roster, if not the worst pitcher in the entire playoff universe. Damaso Marte. The same Damaso Marte who appeared in 21 games in 2009, threw 13 innings, allowed 14 earned runs and posted a 9.45 ERA.

How is that sequence even remotely defensible? I’ve been looking all day, and am still waiting for the dozens of articles questioning the choices Girardi made in that inning. Here’s one, from Jesse Spector, of the NY Daily News:

…. the burden of a collapse in this series would fall squarely on Girardi, who has made decisions in both losses that are indefensible. In both Games 3 and 5 in Anaheim, Girardi’s management of the Yankees’ pitching staff left fans saying to themselves, “What the hell is he thinking?” And that was before Alfredo Aceves coughed up Game 3, and before A.J. Burnett let the tying runs get on base in Game 5. From the time that Aceves came in, and from the time that Burnett stayed in after a long top of the frame, Girardi’s decisions had “mistake” written all over them. Both proved catastrophic.

Is that it? The umpires are getting raked for their mistakes. They’re writing about how Nick Swisher made the first and the last outs in that fateful seventh. They’re talking about the lousy broadcast coverage, the lack of insight, how Scoscia misused Brian Fuentes, how Fuentes shouldn’t have thrown that fastball to A-Rod. Girardi’s complete mishandling of the bottom of the seventh inning seems to have happened in a vacuum. I was screaming at the television, from the minute he sent Burnett out there, I mean, that was a farce. Here’s the heat Girardi has taken for it, the MLB page for Sports Illustrated has the following headlines:

Breathless ninth drains emotion from all
Angels’ aggressive approach pays dividends
Game 6 critical for Yanks’ Series rotation

From ESPN’s MLB page:

Managing their thoughts

Here’s what I would’ve chosen:

Girardi’s gaffe
Loss falls on manager

« Previous | Home | Next »

20 Responses to “…. It’s a mistake”

  1. Anonymous says:

    あなたたちは通常、??何あまりにも 。 この種のカバレッジを賢い仕事や!私の| |私たち||私の個人的なの君たち。
    モンクレール イタリア

  2. Anonymous says:

    珍しいうわーそれはあった。 本当に長いコメントが、私は表示されませんでした私のコメントを提出した後にクリックした私はちょうど書きました。気まぐれ…よく私は再び上ですべてのことを書いていないよ。 とにかくブログ、単に素晴らしいを言いたかった!
    モンクレール メンズ acorus

  3. Anonymous says:

    すごい迫力! このテンプレート/テーマを私は本当に です。それは、シンプルでありながら効果的です。それはです多くの時間タフ取得することとの間の「完璧なバランス”ユーザビリティと外観。これで仕事素晴らしいを行って、私はあなたが持っているあなたがしたあなたがしたこと言わなければならない。 関連、ブログの負荷が非常に超 迅速上の私のためクローム。 優れブログ!
    クロムハーツ ピアス メンズ 通販

  4. Anonymous says:

    マイ開発者|、PHPから。ネットに移動するために私を納得させる説得しようとしている。 私はいつものためのアイデアを嫌っている。しかし、彼は少ないどれもtryiongんだ。 数多くのに|WordPressの可動型私が使用してきた約年のWebサイトや午前神経質別のプラットフォームへの切り替えに関する。 blogengine.net約物事私はを聞いたことがある。方法はありますか私はでき転送すべての私のワードプレス|そこにコンテンツ投稿? 任意のヘルプは大幅されるであろうが理解!
    プラダ 和歌山

  5. Anonymous says:

    まず第一に|優れたと言う私がしたいと私がしたいブログ!私は簡単な質問を持っていた心|私はあなたがいないをすればそうでない場合は、聞きしたいのですが、その。 あなた自身とクリアを中央にどのように興味好奇心 見つけるために知っている前書き込み私がいた。 私が持っているいた困難な時期|アイデアを得ることに私のクリア思考の心を出。 私は本当にない|書き込みそれはでの喜びを取る楽しむ通常、ちょうど最初の10?15分のように思えるちょうど開始する方法を把握しよう。どれ提案またはヒント? それを感謝!
    モンクレール ダウン 一覧 メンズ

  6. Anonymous says:

    こんにちは!私の中の誰かので、私はを見てみましょうに来て私たちと一緒に| |ウェブサイト マイスペースFacebookのグループがこれを共有した。情報は|私は間違いなく愛し楽しんよ。私は今ブックマークを、私のフォロワーにこれをツイートされます! ワンダフルブログと素晴らしい スタイルとデザイン。
    prada セール

  7. jzlzsnqqhd says:


  8. Nike Air Max BW Pas Cher est la plus ing.niosit. des chaussures de course jamais!Nike Air Max Pas Cher, .galement connu sous le nom Nike Air Max pas cher! Une vieille marque, chaussures NIKE classique absolu plus deSoldes Nike Air Max Pas Cher, et DUNK SB si simple.Nike Air Max, qui est également un ventilateur de marques populaires ressemblent. Ce sera comme nous l’avons signal. Nike Air Max 2013 pas cher aper.u 1, dans lequel est inclus le style r.tro de vue, les nouvelles technologies EM tissu respirant, et la texture de haute absolue de la rie haut de gamme Nike Tn Requin Pas Cher

Leave a Reply

All commentary is the opinion of John J Perricone unless otherwise noted.
None of the opinions expressed should be construed as being endorsed by the
San Francisco Giants, Major League Baseball, or any other organization mentioned herein.

Powered by WordPress

eXTReMe Tracker

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License