<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8230;. Worthy of the Hall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlybaseballmatters.com/archives/2008/12/21/worthy-of-the-hall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlybaseballmatters.com/archives/2008/12/21/worthy-of-the-hall/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:05:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zo</title>
		<link>http://www.onlybaseballmatters.com/archives/2008/12/21/worthy-of-the-hall/comment-page-1/#comment-32274</link>
		<dc:creator>Zo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 22:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlybaseballmatters.com/?p=931#comment-32274</guid>
		<description>These are good ideas.  If they eliminated the 5% rule, I would like to suggest a replacement - that if any player not on the ballot (for whatever reason) received 5% of the votes, as a write-in, they could add that player back to the ballot for consideration for some period of time (2 years?).  That way, if in a few years as an example, the steroid boogie-man seemed just somewhat less an automatic disqualification than it does now, some players such as Mark McGwire or Barry Lamar Bonds could re-qualify for the hall.  Public opinion changes, and that means even guys who are absolutely sure of themselves, like baseball writers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are good ideas.  If they eliminated the 5% rule, I would like to suggest a replacement &#8211; that if any player not on the ballot (for whatever reason) received 5% of the votes, as a write-in, they could add that player back to the ballot for consideration for some period of time (2 years?).  That way, if in a few years as an example, the steroid boogie-man seemed just somewhat less an automatic disqualification than it does now, some players such as Mark McGwire or Barry Lamar Bonds could re-qualify for the hall.  Public opinion changes, and that means even guys who are absolutely sure of themselves, like baseball writers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.onlybaseballmatters.com/archives/2008/12/21/worthy-of-the-hall/comment-page-1/#comment-32182</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlybaseballmatters.com/?p=931#comment-32182</guid>
		<description>Amen to that!  As a kid I couldn&#039;t understand that lack of respect for Grich.  I bring him up now and baseball fans at work laugh because they haven&#039;t really &quot;heard of him.&quot;  &quot;Exactly&quot; is my usual reply, &quot;why is that?&quot;  When I first read Bill James, Grich and Darrell Evans (and later Mickey Tettleton) jumped out at me as baseball revelations!  

Happy holidays guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to that!  As a kid I couldn&#8217;t understand that lack of respect for Grich.  I bring him up now and baseball fans at work laugh because they haven&#8217;t really &#8220;heard of him.&#8221;  &#8220;Exactly&#8221; is my usual reply, &#8220;why is that?&#8221;  When I first read Bill James, Grich and Darrell Evans (and later Mickey Tettleton) jumped out at me as baseball revelations!  </p>
<p>Happy holidays guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
